Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:48:01 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org> Cc: FREEBSD - SCSI - LIST <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: performance with LSI SAS 1064 Message-ID: <46D6CA91.3080707@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <46D6C8C2.3000504@freebsd.org> References: <71d0ebb0708291245g79d2141fx73cc8a6e76875944@mail.gmail.com> <46D5E17F.3070403@samsco.org> <71d0ebb0708291416v17351c65u7ccc1b7bbe0271d2@mail.gmail.com> <46D5E5B1.207@samsco.org> <71d0ebb0708291506i49649a60l8006deafb20891ac@mail.gmail.com> <46D63710.1020103@freebsd.org> <46D64020.3000503@samsco.org> <46D6C8C2.3000504@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric Anderson wrote: > Scott Long wrote: >> Eric Anderson wrote: >>> Lutieri G. wrote: >>>> I've make a test with dd command: >>>> >>>> # time dd if=/dev/zero of=./8gbfile bs=1024k count=8192 >>>> 8192+0 records in >>>> 8192+0 records out >>>> 8589934592 bytes transferred in 155.653213 secs (55186362 bytes/sec) >>>> 0.007u 25.129s 2:35.69 16.1% 55+6039k 117+68628io 0pf+0w >>>> >>>> in other terminal i ran iostat while dd were running and I get this: >>>> >>>> # iostat -I 1 >>>> tty da0 pass0 cpu >>>> tin tout KB/t xfrs MB KB/t xfrs MB us ni sy in id >>>> 1 61 25.23 52958 1305.07 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 8 0 91 >>>> 0 184 127.48 434 54.03 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 5 0 95 >>>> 0 61 127.49 440 54.78 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 5 0 95 >>>> 0 61 127.75 445 55.52 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 5 0 95 >>>> 0 61 127.49 442 55.03 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 4 0 96 >>>> 0 61 127.49 436 54.28 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 5 0 95 >>>> 0 61 125.27 425 51.99 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 5 1 94 >>>> 0 61 118.14 393 45.34 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 3 0 97 >>>> >>>> average 54MB/s with or without hw.mpt.enable_sata_wc seted in >>>> loader.conf file. >>>> >>>> is it a normal speed for this adapter?! >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> I'm confused - you said in your first post you were getting 3MB/s, >>> where above you show something like 55MB/s. >>> >>> You didn't say what kind of disks, or how many, the configuration, >>> etc - so it's hard to answer much. The 55MB/s seems pretty decent >>> for many hard drives in a sequential use state (which is what dd >>> tests really). >>> >>> Your errors before were probably caused because your queue depth is >>> set to 255 (or 256?) and the adapter can't do that many. You should >>> use camcontrol to reduce it, to maybe 32. See the camcontrol man >>> page for the right usage. It's something that needs setting on every >>> boot, so a startup file is a good place for it maybe. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> >> >> Well, if he's using SATA (which I kinda assumed originally without >> asking) then queue depth isn't going to matter; the MPT driver has no >> interaction with how SATA NCQ operates, if he even has a rev of the >> LSI chip that supports NCQ at all. If he's using SAS, then queue >> depth will only be a minor factor, CAM is pretty good at autosizing >> the depth with minimal impact. Now, if he's using SAS disks then >> the boot tunable that I gave him will indeed have no impact at all. >> >> I believe that the Sun 4100 uses 2.5" disks, whether SATA or SAS. >> 54MB/s is not all that bad for disks of this size. It's pretty close >> to what I would expect, actually. > > If he's using a SAS Seagate 15k rpm 2.5" drive, he could see much better > than 55MB/s. I have an LSI (PCI-X 133, model 1064 as he does) with some > Seagate 15k RPM drives, and I can get 100MB/s. Tests were done on > FreeBSD 7-CURRENT, with write caching enabled on the drive. Here's some > of the numbers: > Ah, I didn't know that Seagate made 15k drives in the 2.5" form factor, I was expecting just 7200 or 10k. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46D6CA91.3080707>