From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov  2 09:31:48 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E622EF77
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Nov 2012 09:31:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F078FC12
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Nov 2012 09:31:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.129] (vie-188-118-240-184.dsl.sil.at
 [188.118.240.184])
 by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 733253F40F;
 Fri,  2 Nov 2012 05:26:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 10:26:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: bsd.gcc.mk: USE_FORTRAN.
In-Reply-To: <5056E655.4070706@yandex.ru>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211021023250.2266@tuna.site>
References: <5056E655.4070706@yandex.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 09:31:49 -0000

Hi Ruslan,

On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> is there any possibility to also add something like 
> USE_FORTRAN_BUILD=[yes|g77|ifort] to make fortran build dependency
> only? Many ports will benefit from this - anything, that depend on 
> math/py-numpy for example.

we definitely can look into this.  But, how about the run-time
dependency?  Those ports that you have in mind, don't they have
any dependency on one of the GCC run-time libraries?

Gerald