From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 5 20:47:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465991065670 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1985A8FC12 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:47:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:From:Mime-Version:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=McaTZ/tdgeKGgH/5a0+ilzNY8INLHLIyaLsq3xfy5vQ=; b=MckC6rc0ilcH/1g0zKLek8qroYgW4gAugi2nc8zcs6wNzzL8uipUAXeDHCueHYAHHXmLoDmA6PIvpQs9xsL1TYZPVDfdTbtYZH1HWWvA5Pc0PWi8ZjjfH4UL3bgI/+8n; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Smsxm-000Fgm-9Z for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:47:46 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1341521265-94480-94479/5/96; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:47:45 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4FF5BB56.10100@my.gd> <4FF5E22D.9000007@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:47:45 -0500 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4FF5E22D.9000007@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:47:47 -0000 On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:51:25 -0500, Matthew Seaman wrote: > AFAIK, no > operating system has a stub resolver the capability to validate DNSSEC. Yeah, I was sort of hinting at that :-)