From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 15:28:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A3E106564A for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 15:28:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392398FC0C for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 15:28:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.248.111]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4SFUCa1005698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 17:30:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4SFTref023489 for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 17:29:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <483D7A22.9000206@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 17:28:34 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080504) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 212.31.247.179 Subject: Testing lagg X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:28:46 -0000 Hello. I've got a new box which features two gigabit ports and I though I'd try lagg with LACP. On the box I put the following in /etc/rc.conf: ifconfig_em0="up" ifconfig_em1="up" ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto lacp laggport em0 laggport em1 192.168.100.101 netmask 255.255.255.0" Then I aggregated the ports on the switch (3com). This seems to work fine, although I see a 30 seconds delay from the moment a network cable is unplugged and the moment the network works again. Is this normal? Can this time be reduced? Any other hint or gotcha? bye & Thanks av.