From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Oct 17 09:06:08 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA08684
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 09:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA08671
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 09:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id LAA00585; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 11:02:23 -0500
From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Message-Id: <199610171602.LAA00585@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Subject: Re: IP bugs in FreeBSD 2.1.5
To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith)
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 11:02:23 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com, phk@critter.tfs.com,
        jkh@time.cdrom.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199610170148.LAA09591@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Oct 17, 96 11:18:54 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Terry Lambert stands accused of saying:
> > 
> > I pretty much don't have the time because I'd insist on ISO 9000
> > standards for the process; these basically boil down to:
> > 
> > 1)	Define a process
> > 2)	Document the process in a policy manual
> > 3)	Follow the process by obeying the policy manual
> > 4)	Document the act following the process so that it is provable
> > 	that the process was followed for each release
> > 
> > This would be a full time job... job title: "release engineer".
> 
> My documented process now requires me to laugh uncontrollably.
> 
> ha.
> 
> (Sorry Scott)

Isn't that supposed to be:

"Our documented process says I must now laugh in your face and double
our price."  :-)  (10/11/96 on the Web site, I believe)

What would life be without Dilbert...

... JG