From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 11 16:04:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B786E106566C for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE9D8FC17 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:04:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2BG4Edm019225; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:04:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n2BG4CdP019222; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:04:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:04:12 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Eduardo Morras In-Reply-To: <20090311155436.47BF94FC80A@xroff.net> Message-ID: References: <20090311012018.2075c3d9@gom.home> <20090311140247.GE86605@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <20090311154613.0a90e64b.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090311155436.47BF94FC80A@xroff.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd vs gpl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:04:27 -0000 > At 16:09 11/03/2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> That's why the GPL is often called a "viral license". As >> >> GPL is a communist licence. > > No, even communist are more generous ... It's not funny. Communism is common today, and it's getting stronger from day they just changed to names to hide. Computers are just one thing. As usual - Richard Stallman probably wanted good, but - it turned as usual.