From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Tue Mar 28 10:26:08 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F6DD1FFF7; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8948DEFC; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from besplex.bde.org (c122-106-153-191.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.153.191]) by mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B15C31040F1B; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:51:49 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:51:48 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Warner Losh cc: Bruce Evans , Warner Losh , src-committers , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: svn commit: r316064 - head/sys/boot/i386/boot2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20170328203618.N1920@besplex.bde.org> References: <201703272253.v2RMra2L032487@repo.freebsd.org> <20170328141213.T927@besplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=AYLBJzfG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Tj3pCpwHnMupdyZSltBt7Q==:117 a=Tj3pCpwHnMupdyZSltBt7Q==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=ecsj_lGnN_rLbzqxT6gA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:26:08 -0000 On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Warner Losh wrote: > [[ sorry for the top post but it's quick ]] It's quicker and almost equivalent to delete what you reply to. > Summary, in Bruce's own words > >> the whole optimization step was silly. > > I agree. on my -current system, clang compiled boot2 was 4 bytes > smaller after ripping it out. gcc was a whopping 7 bytes larger. Since > gcc has 156 still free, I think it's best to just retire this. > > Maybe you can give me a hint as to which structs to look at to get > back those 7 bytes :) Just sort the character arrays to get back 4. Maybe clang already does this, though I like getting the same order as in the sources. Reducing 1 of the arrays by 1 byte would then save 1 and get back the other 3. Bruce