From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 07:54:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D0A1065677 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:54:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F808FC12 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywm3 with SMTP id 3so4649567ywm.13 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:54:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Zzm8HE1Bt/IQxlYu48SIcXzNjsCrg3pJYvHSvuMJsBQ=; b=d/fD5p3oHSx1q7WwRrbkYfnAToY+6jRvabumce2++DeHbBYGgmCOSzg+ixvph1UZbV S0QCwWQej2ScCkchXeYGyJXH0cR0KDL15PMm7cl8Vb70z+xlQLJV3EmXYFx0OdGt6/g+ 3+rfVKsviN3Xv6woeuCcubaGimRDWOD/M0L7A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.217.33 with SMTP id ov1mr878268obc.26.1319183673073; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:54:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.122.33 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:54:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20111020082234.GA4568@britannica.bec.de> <4EA00DEF.3030905@FreeBSD.org> <20111020190553.6bf95790@kan.dnsalias.net> <20111020192653.6425f018@kan.dnsalias.net> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:54:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Wojciech Puchar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: .eh_frame, .eh_frame_hdr - how to remove that trash X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:54:34 -0000 On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> on entry into each function, which is different from usual x86 >> convention. >> Asynchronous unwind info (yeah, same stuff you keep referring to as >> crap), is the only way you can debug your program or get anything >> remotely close to usable backtrace, by default. > > i understand but i DO NOT called compiler with -g option which clearly means > that i do not want to debug isn't it? It seems like a binutils bug (or somewhere in that immediate neighborhood) because all debugging related sections should be stripped out by strip including unwind, correct? Thanks, -Garrett