From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Aug 16 13:04:42 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA11830
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 13:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA11822
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 13:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id NAA17087; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 13:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199608162003.NAA17087@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Paul T. Root" <proot@horton.iaces.com>
cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpress Pro/100 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 16 Aug 1996 11:58:20 CDT."
             <199608161658.LAA03230@horton.iaces.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 13:03:31 -0700
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Hi,
>	I'm trying to get an EtherExpress Pro/100 working on 2.1.5R, but
>it wasn't seen. I know I saw that the card has to be Revision B. I don't 
>know if mine does or not. How do I tell? And what device is it going to
>use? ix? Any config to do to it?

   Look at the device type that is reported. If it is 0x1227, then it is a
Pro/100 and not supported. If it is 0x1229, then it is a Pro/100B and is
supported.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project