From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul  1 13:23:09 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738E737B401
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Tue,  1 Jul 2003 13:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE95543FE9
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Tue,  1 Jul 2003 13:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h61KN7AI015720;
	Tue, 1 Jul 2003 16:23:07 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 16:23:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: Nicole <nicole@unixgirl.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.030701131209.nicole@unixgirl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10307011620330.15381-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: The Mailing List search engine sems broken :(
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: deischen@freebsd.org
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 20:23:09 -0000

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Nicole wrote:
> 
> Um.. Is it just me or is the FreeBSD Mailing List search engine broken?
> 
>  No matter what I search for and no matter what list I select it says "not
> found"

Yep, it's borken.  I noticed this earlier.  That search
engine never really gave me good results anyways; perhaps
it's better to be forced to use google.

-- 
Dan Eischen