From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Feb 7 0:42:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (ns.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4275A37B4EC for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 00:42:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.112]) by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f178fP815412 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:41:35 +0200 Received: (from max@localhost) by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f17860B02163; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:06:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) From: Maxim Sobolev Message-Id: <200102070806.f17860B02163@vic.sabbo.net> Subject: Re: Change XLIB location... To: john@office.naver.co.id (John Indra) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:04:52 +0200 (EET) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20010207095734.E78692@office.naver.co.id> from "John Indra" at Feb 07, 2001 09:57:39 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Oh yeah, and could Mesa port maintainer upgrade the Mesa port version to > Mesa 2.4 (if I'm not mistaken, that is the latest version right?) > Since Mesa included in XFree86 4.0.2 is Mesa 2.4, I don't see the reason of > not upgrading the Mesa port ASAP too... > No, there will not be an update to Mesa 2.4 for the followign reasons: 1. Mesa 2.4 has broken assembler routines (missed some files, broken detection in configure script etc.); 2. Mesa 2.4 is incompatible with utah-glx, therefore upgrade would make this port broken; 3. XFree86 4.0.2 uses only glut and GLU libraries from Mesa, they are contributes software for Mesa and do not change very much from release to release, so update would buy very little for XFree86 4.0.2 users. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message