Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:26:20 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Technological advantages over Linux Message-ID: <20200215052620.GA1482@admin.sibptus.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAEJNuHyaUXbQm5L6JNr2fmb4rdh4ZTVd=WX-i__iXkKChAk%2BUw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20200214121620.GA80657@admin.sibptus.ru> <CAEJNuHwRs=6kOK9uiFzEAqCgSgvUb8Xm5o2VWnK-ND_zseowdg@mail.gmail.com> <20200214141600.GA82559@admin.sibptus.ru> <CAEJNuHyaUXbQm5L6JNr2fmb4rdh4ZTVd=WX-i__iXkKChAk%2BUw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ottavio Caruso via freebsd-questions wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 14:16, Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> wrote: > > > > Ottavio Caruso via freebsd-questions wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 12:16, Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > > > > > > Not to start a flame war. A purely technical question: what > > > > technological advantages does the modern FreeBSD have over modern L= inux? > > > > > > Sorry, but I find this sort of a chalk vs cheese kind of comparison. > > > > Of course not. When deciding what to use in the next project, you have > > to advocate your choice in front of your superiors and colleagues, and > > your presentation should be well backed up with technical arguments. >=20 > I didn't really (and still don't) know the circumstances of your work > environment. Failing that, this is really a chalk vs cheese scenario. > I find both FreeBSD and Linux technically valid solutions (and I throw > NetBSD into the mix). One has to be pragmatic and evaluate solutions > against problems first. Advocating an OS over another one without > taking care of circumstances doesn't make good advocacy. Fine, let's apply your approach, it could yield interesting results. Can we find 3-4 real world scenarios where FreeBSD cannot be replaced by Linux without important negative technical and business consequences of said replacement? Other than a case of unacceptability of the GNU license for some legal reason, I cannot imagine such a scenario. Unfortunatly, I've seen lots of reverse cases where Linux cannot be replaced by FreeBSD. Docker and friends come to mind first. >=20 > (I'm not having a go at you. I'm just talking out of my experience.) Please keep on talking :-) --=20 Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJeR4D8AAoJEA2k8lmbXsY0UkIH/3hK/jPL77f+oOSrA9qchIqx RsGVPPp9a9EVs1hBkCGaXyrGfewz+0P9osobXHb+rQrsH7rLwLmJjATMm7Q0dXbA gaws2WP4FgpAX9ewjXniOTgmQFSa/io/G/wxNmD2rB46QphmV6RRObbSkPpmwJe6 PwoWvQHK1Mbh6Drx2bD7XockjdyYCBN46jUgFfqHBSY/6T2szoNO50jfHG6EyLAY pf4z1DeyEKTbxtlvbp9qtVeMmZb1QEtoamyA2vMVkh/a6wV5JpnZiDVYmJfZOR5K m0voAqSZSrOlUQ5oiwACfsK8pmcOc9vjtPL7+nqO7dqVAfzAeUK/dXDjV1By7as= =HtKn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200215052620.GA1482>