From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 30 16:26:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B5416A4CE; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:26:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF41B43D55; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:26:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20040331002622015007hr35e>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:26:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA46653; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:36:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:36:27 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek cc: Robert Watson cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: performance of jailed processes X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:26:24 -0000 On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Robert Watson writes: > > If you plug 'YOUR_IP' with variations, does it change things? >=20 > Aha! using the primary IP address works fine, but using one of the > jail IPs does not. ANY of them? try the first added and the last added. do they have different delays?