From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 6 13:07:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AFAAB1F for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6268A12BE for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.21] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77C343B4E for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 07:07:09 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <52F388EE.30609@marino.st> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:54 +0100 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Has NO_MANCOMPRESS been silently depreciated? References: <20140206125459.GA45474@titania.njm.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <20140206125459.GA45474@titania.njm.me.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:07:23 -0000 On 2/6/2014 13:54, N.J. Mann wrote: > For many years I have set NO_MANCOMPRESS (and before that NOMANCOMPRESS) > in /etc/make.conf on all my machines. In the last few weeks I have > noticed that this setting is being ignored by port updates. Has this > setting been silently depreciated? > You have been setting it in make.conf? I don't believe it was ever a user variable. Anyway, yes, it doesn't do anything on staged ports and it was "silently removed" because it was for port maintainers only, not users. (subject to confirmation by the experts). John