From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 21:53:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFE016A400; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 21:53:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9792D13C448; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 21:53:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA10620A3; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:53:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987BA20A2; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:53:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8862BA10AC; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 23:53:01 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Ben Kaduk" References: <20070407120656.GD63916@garage.freebsd.pl> <20070408151358.GX63916@garage.freebsd.pl> <200704091335.42092.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20070409190743.GL76673@garage.freebsd.pl> <47d0403c0704091338p4c6476fey5d90e0dfb3a50cbf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:53:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <47d0403c0704091338p4c6476fey5d90e0dfb3a50cbf@mail.gmail.com> (Ben Kaduk's message of "Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:38:15 -0500") Message-ID: <86odlxcj0i.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Host ID. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:53:07 -0000 "Ben Kaduk" writes: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes: > > I don't agree. As Robert pointed out there are situation you would > > like to share the same UUID between many hosts. > This may be a bit pedantic, but I thought the case Robert described > was for a way to have an identical setup on many machines but still > allow for having a different UUID on each one. If a host is a hot spare for another, you might want it to have the same UUID as the primary. Reading the UUID from hardware is fine as long as it is only done when initializing /hostid on a system which does not already have it. (any particular reason to store it in /hostid instead of /etc/hostid?) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no