From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 30 23:16:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (blizzard.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE50237BE5C for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 23:16:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@freebsd.org) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.106]) by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA29589; Wed, 31 May 2000 09:14:57 +0300 (EEST) Received: from freebsd.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vic.sabbo.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA35865; Wed, 31 May 2000 09:15:55 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <3934AE16.39164341@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 09:15:50 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Langille Cc: Will Andrews , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where did mail/qpopper3 come from? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dan Langille wrote: > Then why do we have both popper and popper3? Because old popper is widely used and relatively good tested, so many people may opt to use old version instead. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message