From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 1 23:47:23 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D0116A41F; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfesler@gigo.com) Received: from vette.gigo.com (vette.gigo.com [216.218.228.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E150A13C594; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfesler@gigo.com) Received: from vette.gigo.com (vette.gigo.com [216.218.228.114]) by vette.gigo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28971F9; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:19:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Fesler To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <46B1135A.10706@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <46B01D5E.6050004@psg.com> <20070801110727.GC59008@menantico.com> <46B0EDEA.8050608@FreeBSD.org> <18097.4424.855875.392421@roam.psg.com> <46B1135A.10706@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Randy Bush , FreeBSD Current , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: default dns config change causing major poolpah X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:47:23 -0000 > So no changes should be made unless everyone agrees? IMO, when the issue is split as such, that means "no change". I would have instead offered a sample config with clear documentation saying what the intent of that specific sample was for; but the "stock" config would have been much as it was before the change. (Even if I'm *personally* interested in this option.)