From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 22 11:58:23 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1BF1065673
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:58:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.215.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE768FC0C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:58:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eyx24 with SMTP id 24so112152eyx.13
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 04:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references
	:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type;
	bh=P9fziiwHDTt/j1i/P+WsHNtWItwM0MOJsIBnBa0UBTk=;
	b=m4zVe2lURhuO5PSDd2VQTmqQWb1luNvjehDKyuwP0mRzwjztI3gblnF6rEwakcU+se
	EzciPF7qpqTMYEHptl8ZcMzH5mT/m1cOYYzbg/rqjxmmDX/kQXfw+677pNjBHOlEjcnI
	/Lgngq6zv9y32wDWE/cnkR9MN8KMINTpj1DYM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
	:user-agent:mime-version:content-type;
	b=ccY3N+Vqiv99zNrI0XWpy9AQ2MgSviZz59gy4ZnPyALkOCTykCTCyUF7DIgifRQZ5j
	kxIhZsS67CWhfVulOALMNOA083PTP9tVoWeXw3lGoWdPNm7fX+RnsqETfizTu+ObmnG0
	l6DsqfsSkd/AKNe9C1xoCgzz6Uv3A7ADB3LRY=
Received: by 10.213.114.19 with SMTP id c19mr555238ebq.97.1285156701510;
	Wed, 22 Sep 2010 04:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (535081FD.cm-6-1c.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.80.129.253])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v59sm14623589eeh.4.2010.09.22.04.58.18
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 04:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bormida <pbormida@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinNPgm5pJS-OY28t5fScwtv+KHg-rXeBMqJd9Ht@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:53:01 +0400
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinNPgm5pJS-OY28t5fScwtv+KHg-rXeBMqJd9Ht@mail.gmail.com>
	(Paolo Bormida's message of "Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:42:37 +0200")
Message-ID: <86tylij8pu.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: amule-10275
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:58:23 -0000

Paolo Bormida <pbormida@gmail.com> writes:

> Does amule2 port switched from a stable 2.2.5 release to a daily
> snapshot?

Yes, snapshots are gonna be used unless there are more frequent releases
upstream. You can find the history of changes on freshports.

  http://www.freshports.org/net-p2p/amule2

The package name also switched from `aMule' to `amule' in order to
remove silly vendor capitalization and match port *directory* name.

Besides, I plan to rename the port to plain `amule' with the next update
in order to remove last bit of confusion, i.e. `2' version suffix in
port directory name and in LATEST_LINK.

> Does the sparc64 port still has the daily snapshot instead of the more
> up-to-date 2.2.6_4 available?

aMule-10266.tbz and amule-10275.tbz are newer than aMule-2.2.6_4.tbz
unless I'm missing smth.

  $ pkg_version
  aMule                               <
  $ portmaster -L
  ===>>> aMule-2.2.6_4
          ===>>> New version available: amule-10275

I can only find aMule-10266.tbz for sparc64 for 8-stable, though.