Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Mar 1995 19:07:17 -0800 (PST)
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
To:        paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul Richards)
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.org, faq@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Why IDE is bad
Message-ID:  <199503230307.TAA07865@ref.tfs.com>
In-Reply-To: <199503230306.DAA05310@isl.cf.ac.uk> from "Paul Richards" at Mar 23, 95 03:06:01 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In reply to Poul-Henning Kamp who said
> > 
> > I just made a simple test, this shows why IDE is inferior to SCSI for
> > FreeBSD:
> > 
> 
> Well, no-one doubted this but your test is a little unfair on EIDE. You may
> still end up being right but until we have true EIDE support we can't really
> judge how well it's going to perform.

As you will notice, I compared IDE to SCSI, not EIDE to SCSI

When we have EIDE, I will damn that in a separate message :-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent'
=> 'no rude people are relevant'



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503230307.TAA07865>