From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 22 19:07:58 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA25761 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 19:07:58 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA25753; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 19:07:55 -0800 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id TAA07865; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 19:07:17 -0800 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199503230307.TAA07865@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: Why IDE is bad To: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul Richards) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 1995 19:07:17 -0800 (PST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, faq@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199503230306.DAA05310@isl.cf.ac.uk> from "Paul Richards" at Mar 23, 95 03:06:01 am Content-Type: text Content-Length: 644 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > In reply to Poul-Henning Kamp who said > > > > I just made a simple test, this shows why IDE is inferior to SCSI for > > FreeBSD: > > > > Well, no-one doubted this but your test is a little unfair on EIDE. You may > still end up being right but until we have true EIDE support we can't really > judge how well it's going to perform. As you will notice, I compared IDE to SCSI, not EIDE to SCSI When we have EIDE, I will damn that in a separate message :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'