From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 24 05:32:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD2A36FE51 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:32:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dalescott@shaw.ca) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BCdBl6fpLz4fZx for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dalescott@shaw.ca) Received: from cds220.dcs.int.inet ([10.0.153.144]) by shaw.ca with ESMTP id yqK4jluU862bryqK5jcukc; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 23:32:46 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shaw.ca; s=s20180605; t=1595568766; bh=YYkj8sCLyonpej/G3gF+ASmhQz2mc7UJKM3d8dWvI/U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject; b=EMHfouU295pKrCH6LC6Wz0tmmGESLT2ypxskdol7oLKUGyQfMvCweUAc2ZdSn1KPV mf9L2x0y8eqiJaKstheJuxJ53Oc9B7Z78pyuGNzqAoZVsD0pXIIjGQQlesJ0QwG0wF PGQkohJOVMNoKhm05T2gKn9X2wJhp993Jj4wNk8EyPNk/34Jmfzfygq+7qMxSNPE0C 7fvILsh+IQIvaPH0d1nj19NHkDXR+2pFIrqlNIAi33YCQYEDXq0raJxqjDZxJz712G Ho0GCUW96KNSnpaAHNxSbxN37UNRBQonq81wQWEBWU8AZ9hNHGLcM4dNoJT6uPqTD9 r6oZRKsQ5nnMw== X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=LKf9vKe9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=YjOmSjUxhsfmstj0eziGpw==:117 a=FKkrIqjQGGEA:10 a=RDteU5_PNoYA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=cbhV4p7HAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=d9DUfOFSAAAA:8 a=rcLNRnQaYWKIA68EORgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=z-V2QqvRhG52jeeRkh-B:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=GsQOLwZiQaHj5U2p_RK9:22 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 23:32:44 -0600 (MDT) From: Dale Scott To: Victor Sudakov Cc: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <838706788.121367025.1595568764100.JavaMail.zimbra@shaw.ca> In-Reply-To: <20200724043553.GA62650@admin.sibptus.ru> References: <20200214121620.GA80657@admin.sibptus.ru> <20200724032840.GA61047@admin.sibptus.ru> <20200724043553.GA62650@admin.sibptus.ru> Subject: Re: Technological advantages over Linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [174.0.43.39, 174.0.43.39] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_3899 (ZimbraWebClient - GC84 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_3895) Thread-Topic: Technological advantages over Linux Thread-Index: q7Vp5igCeCCp4LBpoK8J9DU/bq0pLw== X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfAGdjS8tNASuaFHhvFC3kSBiS14OPnskY2cCk8OPWSHFHA8u0Npjs56v8kCRNcosSXbkWCNImG4ay8pVVUMzDyJ3z+UFniBK3AN8jR2mwu12vJ6Hd1bo Z1TTsPByhtvmM3+LDtABnQIM4T2c0G9oMuy7iLSR+vG6iI0/jMsPuZ00ne3eQy8tbeX3y0zvQAL8ccgsAS/CHBrC7A0vIlnFZ0E= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BCdBl6fpLz4fZx X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=shaw.ca header.s=s20180605 header.b=EMHfouU2; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=shaw.ca; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dalescott@shaw.ca designates 64.59.134.13 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dalescott@shaw.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.22 / 15.00]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[shaw.ca:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[shaw.ca:s=s20180605]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.59.134.0/25]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.024]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.016]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[shaw.ca:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[shaw.ca,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.08)[-1.081]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6327, ipnet:64.59.128.0/20, country:CA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.59.134.13:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:32:49 -0000 The greatest technical advantage is that FreeBSD doesn't get in the way as you accomplish the real work you want to do (assuming the real work isn't polishing your desktop). ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Victor Sudakov" > To: "freebsd-questions" > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 10:35:53 PM > Subject: Re: Technological advantages over Linux > hw wrote: >> > >> >> You can add that NFS in FreeBSD is a catastrophy. Bascially, you can only >> export whole file systems with permissions applying to the whole file >> system, and that practically makes NFS unusable. That means >> >> >> 9. very limited NFS support in FreeBSD >> >> > > My experience with NFS is rather limited. I use it to export filesystems r/o > with ISO images, music and such, nothing sophisticated that would > require granular permissions etc. > >> Besides this, setting up NFS in FreeBSD is the opposite of user friendly. > > Maybe ZFS+NFSv4 is better (did not try it myself though)? > > -- > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/