From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu May 18 17:30:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EBCD73D3D for ; Thu, 18 May 2017 17:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB971A4D for ; Thu, 18 May 2017 17:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0F309D73D3C; Thu, 18 May 2017 17:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDECD73D3B for ; Thu, 18 May 2017 17:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mouf.net", Issuer "mouf.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4CDE1A49; Thu, 18 May 2017 17:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) Received: from [10.0.1.92] (cpe-071-065-239-148.nc.res.rr.com [71.65.239.148] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v4IHU4RG050523 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 May 2017 17:30:09 GMT (envelope-from steve@mouf.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mouf.net; s=mail; t=1495128610; bh=LecwhkApsDRyFnfJHMV8o1IRqYnvB5A5zr6RLoUB2vw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=FrJoKBjt2mUnpWwiRAEsZ4M3tXWjXfFj2hBYc7p4to3BdNT4GEWCVA8qKUhFO4ESs QkQdyF5krqAd596jEmu2TRLdIIAGWGAbpV4cgZRS8eOhbFFF8K49+tp6D68dvIOvKG Zweavk1/BZLSRjWpzkzYysDYudkUKGkCJ2S5c+fM= Subject: Re: situation with www/node6 and www/node To: Joseph Mingrone , ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org, swills@FreeBSD.org, luca.pizzamiglio@gmail.com, adamw@FreeBSD.org, bradleythughes@fastmail.fm References: <86fug2cc5o.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> From: Steve Wills Message-ID: <1cabf0dd-bf6f-d172-479b-cd5c0e9e707e@mouf.net> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 13:30:03 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <86fug2cc5o.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5MfhqWD5N7a0rkK11Vg7QQoCvRDU7pkkA" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mouf.net [199.48.129.64]); Thu, 18 May 2017 17:30:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mouf.net X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:30:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --5MfhqWD5N7a0rkK11Vg7QQoCvRDU7pkkA Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="NeHUkhcoQQvkepwXE2QxHM2MwiE4NxKSR"; protected-headers="v1" From: Steve Wills To: Joseph Mingrone , ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org, swills@FreeBSD.org, luca.pizzamiglio@gmail.com, adamw@FreeBSD.org, bradleythughes@fastmail.fm Message-ID: <1cabf0dd-bf6f-d172-479b-cd5c0e9e707e@mouf.net> Subject: Re: situation with www/node6 and www/node References: <86fug2cc5o.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> In-Reply-To: <86fug2cc5o.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> --NeHUkhcoQQvkepwXE2QxHM2MwiE4NxKSR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can execjs work with node6? What else would have to change to get it all onto node6? Steve On 05/18/2017 13:22, Joseph Mingrone wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I am hitting an issue where the conflicting www/node6 and www/node > packages are attempting to be installed together. For example, the > upcoming net-im/mastodon pulls in www/yarn (which depends on www/node6 > by default), and indirectly depends on devel/rubygem-execjs (which > depends on www/node by default). >=20 > It would be ideal if all ports depended on the same node version by > default. Looking at the current state of the ports tree, it would make= > sense for everything to depend on www/node since the only two ports > depending on www/node6 by default are www/npm3 and www/yarn. But, Luca= > makes the point that version 7 of node is not what upstream recommends.= >=20 > Could we come to a consensus here? >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Joseph >=20 --NeHUkhcoQQvkepwXE2QxHM2MwiE4NxKSR-- --5MfhqWD5N7a0rkK11Vg7QQoCvRDU7pkkA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGjBAEBCgCNFiEEmPpBSlwqDvnP0K0N9c9isyB7G6EFAlkd2htfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDk4 RkE0MTRBNUMyQTBFRjlDRkQwQUQwREY1Q0Y2MkIzMjA3QjFCQTEPHHN0ZXZlQG1v dWYubmV0AAoJEPXPYrMgexuhkKQH/isFKKN6GJcgKSAGK49CJy4gWEHIMcKjGZiJ i8uvFtZc3IYwF5vlAo5b1/PMfI6d+0pQOsPKCeVpPY6iaKvV+KKfx5d5O4/2gNmg tHgAK8aD03j8RQR8+Krp7HNX33HiGuPv7R8PIQdfGrPWm5Pmzr5Q0hJjHoI7vB61 zcMQt0kqSDi180WoGdRLy+xvtYFVkT6sWzzDHl+FZYutyLHAikh97QhM4dd0AR3T 8rw/etmqNNzErHKtalYgP08YHoeQkqQTFo+/60+uKJrvT125Cf6BBXyw1bHf6CLi i3aJuBTjKmWZ3CcRv+YH7hCJODQtQDnug8pupU/d9i3tSElWdss= =9A1T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5MfhqWD5N7a0rkK11Vg7QQoCvRDU7pkkA--