From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 28 14:25:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774ED106566C for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:25:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from espartano.mail@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FEE8FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so256640vws.13 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:25:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=D/CtcLgHtfDBkbt89vQpytPSQ40+YkPoH+88akaNp6E=; b=Vcsxh2AJWW/heAqsQDvlJMvPihM5NZyiollC+d6YRGXh9vUfayq5klefCunx8l9vSj MKLmJY2mxgcWQsHrpk9yuKVj7fOQ5e1mhlYdvwTLyOMu5Ylj6c4fWc2r4w+SOWnyo1bF 1o0gmlR/OzNDqXdIsxFe27YSnz/QGkeBfV/KU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.65.228 with SMTP id a4mr302043vdt.137.1309271146405; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.183.137 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:25:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E099A36.7000104@my.gd> References: <4E099A36.7000104@my.gd> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:25:46 -0500 Message-ID: From: Espartano To: Damien Fleuriot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reboot after start pf on ALIX board X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:25:47 -0000 On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > You need to define a dump device then, so that you may extract the > kernel's crash dump for analysis. I don't know if there is enought free space to allocate a kernel dump file into the Alix board's cf card, I will see if it is possible. > > > > [SNIP] > > >> >> Before I updated my Nanobsd image from FreeBSD 8.1 to 8.2 RELEASE my >> alix board worked very well, the big diference between my old nanobsd >> image and my new nanobsd image is that the new one have "option >> VIMAGE" active. >> > > Well, the next logical step would be to comment out the VIMAGE option > and rebuild a kernel don't you think ? > Of course, however I wanted to know if this scenario is useful to the freebsd pf developers. > >> >> Could someone help me ? >> >> If there is some another thing that you need to figure out what was >> happen please let me know. >> > > Describe the procedure you followed to update your machine. > > It is possible that you did not update correctly, who knows... > > I don't think so, when I said "update" I really have installed Nanobsd using FreeBSD 8.2 from scratch. Well at this point I don't know what to do, it is useful for you that I try to get a kernel dump file ? or simply recompile nanobsd without vimage option ? Thanks a lot.