From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 1 19: 4:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DFB37B401 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 19:04:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA37211 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 12:04:34 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA03221; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 12:03:19 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <200107020203.MAA03221@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Gregory Bond To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: tty/ioctl/device driver advice wanted Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 12:03:19 +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [pls cc me I'm not normally on -hackers] I'm working on updating the istallion mulitport serial driver into -Stable. The existing driver occasionally does "return(-ENODEV);" from (functions called from) the device ioctl routine. The new driver that I am trying to fold in does "return ENODEV;". Any advice on which is correct? Is this a bug in istallion.c that has been there since day 1? (And any obvious way of discovering stuff like this other than asking?) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message