Date: Thu, 20 Apr 95 11:49:55 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) To: dufault@hda.com (Peter Dufault) Cc: julian@freefall.cdrom.com, hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: DIGIBOARD driver in ~julian Message-ID: <9504201749.AA25642@cs.weber.edu> In-Reply-To: <199504201048.GAA09638@hda.com> from "Peter Dufault" at Apr 20, 95 06:48:02 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The Linux driver is copyleft and (allegedly) doesn't exploit all > of the features. I'm real hesitant about looking at the Linux > driver until we're sure that no one is going to sign an NDA with > Digi and write a complete object-only driver. > > In spite of the availability of a Linux driver Digi requires signing an > NDA to get access to the documentation for the intelligent boards. > > Is anyone interested in a shareware object only driver? This would only work if the driver was a loadable module AND the driver was undel LGPL instead of GPL so that loading as a kernel module satisfies the relinking requirements of LGPL. Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9504201749.AA25642>