From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 23 08:47:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E77F16A4CE; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:47:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6991C43D46; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:47:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7N8lHiH090319; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:47:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7N8lGbQ090317; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:47:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:47:16 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Murray Stokely Message-ID: <20040823084716.GA88989@abigail.blackend.org> References: <200408230644.i7N6iVKx061706@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408230644.i7N6iVKx061706@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-PRERELEASE cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:47:20 -0000 On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 06:44:31AM +0000, Murray Stokely wrote: > murray 2004-08-23 06:44:31 UTC > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Modified files: > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security chapter.sgml > Log: > Add a few tags around KerberosIV inside titles. > > Previously, Kerberos5 was printed in bold in the table of contents > while KerberosIV was not. > I understand the reason of the change: consistency. However I wonder if it's a good idea to use application tags in titles. For the moment only few applications inside titles are tagged and, of course, the TOC is not really consistent on this point. Any opinion? Marc