Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 17:14:03 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.org> To: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>, ports@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New rules for naming patches Message-ID: <20000719171403.A13769@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0007190959220.3080-100000@blues.jpj.net>; from trevor@jpj.net on Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 10:39:39AM -0400 References: <3975AFE6.EBB9FB9@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSI.4.21.0007190959220.3080-100000@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Trevor Johnson (trevor@jpj.net): > should help make the history more comprehensible: the patches to a > particular source file will automatically go in the same ,v file as > patches are created and removed over the lifetime of a port. Only if you do something like patch-subdir1_subdir2_subdir3_file.name for each file, which is kinda overhead :) However, in my eyes this is still better than just patch-aa :-9 Alex -- cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000719171403.A13769>