From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 5 21:07:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FF01065689 for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F4A8FC1D for ; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F90D5084D; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:07:25 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kqDFi2Sj58xO; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:07:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from laptop.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [72.78.246.37]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 527475084B; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:07:24 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <48E92C48.4010509@langille.org> Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:06:16 -0400 From: Dan Langille Organization: The FreeBSD Diary User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080623) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scot Hetzel References: <48E69A3B.7090904@langille.org> <20081005114425.GA3978@lyxys.ka.sub.org> <790a9fff0810050452u3f83840fg313b86cee3f9cf02@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0810050452u3f83840fg313b86cee3f9cf02@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 7.x : make check-old X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:07:29 -0000 Scot Hetzel wrote: > On 10/5/08, Wolfgang Zenker wrote: >> > Is that list more or less expected? From what I can tell, it's pretty >> > safe to now do a make delete-old-libs. Do you concur? >> >> >> that depends on you having updated all ports/packages as well as the >> base system. I think I used a tool that checks which shared libraries are >> used by which program but can't remember how it was called; but anyway you >> can simply use ldd on your binaries in /usr/local/* to check if any of >> them still use one of the old libs. >> > > I have used the devel/libcheck utility to check for missing libraries > after upgrading the installed ports. Noted. Did that. I may compare that to the ldd output.