Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:53:14 -0500
From:      Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>
To:        Mark Tinguely <marktinguely@gmail.com>
Cc:        alc@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Revision 209887
Message-ID:  <4C3CB61A.1030905@cs.rice.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4C3C7B4E.604@gmail.com>
References:  <4C3C7B4E.604@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Tinguely wrote:
> pmap_qenter() is pretty expensive on the ARM processor with VIPT 
> caches, because remapping a KVA can potentially cause the shared 
> mappings to have their cache turned back on and then immediately 
> turned back off and force a cache flush. Revision 209887 makes 
> amd64/i386 pmap_qenter() make smart decisions on the remapping which 
> would help the ARM.
>
> Looking at the buffer code 2 or 3 weeks ago, and  noticed that most of 
> the pmap_qenter() calls were done wisely. At that time, I was 
> wondering if we could/should fix the few places that involved a page 
> by page loop doing bogus_page substitutions and then calling 
> pmap_qenter() for a full buffer re-map instead of the changed page. It 
> appeared to me that we call pmap_qenter() L*B times where L is the 
> number of pages in the buffer and B is the number of bogus pages in 
> the buffer. We only need to change B pages. I can understand it would 
> not be worth the change if typically the number of pages in a buffer 
> and the number of bogus pages in the buffer is small.

I think that vfs_unbusy_pages(), which is used exclusively by NFS, is 
the only remaining case.  I see no reason not to change it.  Go for it.

Alan




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C3CB61A.1030905>