From owner-freebsd-testing@freebsd.org  Sun Nov  1 05:02:43 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950BFA2F409
 for <freebsd-testing@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun,  1 Nov 2015 05:02:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816221058
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Sun,  1 Nov 2015 05:02:40 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tA152emB076109
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 05:02:40 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
Subject: [Bug 204156] fmemopen tests failing after r289863
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 05:02:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: tests
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: ache@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-204156-32464-GqgGueETFf@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204156-32464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-204156-32464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD <freebsd-testing.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-testing/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 05:02:43 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204156

--- Comment #4 from Andrey A. Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Andrey A. Chernov from comment #2)
The last case:
failed: /usr/src/lib/libc/tests/stdio/fmemopen2_test.c:203: pos == 0 not met
not failed in -current when written in plain C:

fp = fmemopen(buf, sizeof(buf), "a+");
fwrite(str2, 1, sizeof(str2), fp);
fseek(fp, 0, SEEK_SET);
printf("pos %d\n", ftell(fp) == 0);

So I think all of this is ATF-specific bugs, probably with wrong type cast in
their macros, and I don't want to debug ATF. If you think otherwise, please
post plain C test which fails after r289863. 

IMHO, ATF is evil and can't be used to prove anything, only to extract from
there and convert to plain C.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.