From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 6 08:33:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7820E37B401 for ; Tue, 6 May 2003 08:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sauron.fto.de (p15106025.pureserver.info [217.160.140.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08D943FD7 for ; Tue, 6 May 2003 08:33:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hschaefer@fto.de) Received: from localhost (localhost.fto.de [127.0.0.1]) by sauron.fto.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4FD25C0FE; Tue, 6 May 2003 17:33:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sauron.fto.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sauron [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22580-09; Tue, 6 May 2003 17:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from giskard.foundation.hs (p5091A82E.dip.t-dialin.net [80.145.168.46]) by sauron.fto.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97E025C0F7; Tue, 6 May 2003 17:33:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daneel.foundation.hs (daneel.foundation.hs [192.168.20.2]) by giskard.foundation.hs (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA42643; Tue, 6 May 2003 17:33:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hschaefer@fto.de) Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 17:33:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Heiko Schaefer X-X-Sender: heiko@daneel.foundation.hs To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <54540.1052233928@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: <20030506172108.N66653@daneel.foundation.hs> References: <54540.1052233928@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at fto.de cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: data corruption with current (maybe sis chipset related?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 15:33:15 -0000 Hi Poul, > >the board is an elitegroup k7-s5a lan (with sis 735 chipset), the cpu an > >amd xp 1800+ (i specifically bought that hardware very recently to run a > >gbde-based nfs server on it). > > And just to get it done and over with: No overclock, right ? certainly not by intention. if i could reduce speed by 30% and thereby get that machine provably rock-solid, i'd go for it ;) ...of course there might be something weird in the bios settings along the lines of overclocking (there are always these confusing settings for various timings in bioses). haven't changed anything there, but also not checked what the settings are. i plan to poke around in these, but don't really hope for insight or improvement. [damn, i hate obscure probably-hardware-related problems] regards, Heiko