From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  4 21:44:16 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0BB2216A4CE; Wed,  4 May 2005 21:44:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9BDBD43D6B; Wed,  4 May 2005 21:44:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11])
	j44LhPik014282;	Wed, 4 May 2005 17:43:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 17:43:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net
To: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20050504205745.GH76171@stack.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0505041741310.498-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net)
cc: das@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Floating point exceptions with -pthread
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 21:44:16 -0000

On Wed, 4 May 2005, Marc Olzheim wrote:

> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:22:00PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> > So it really seems to be in the floorf() and ceilf() code.
>
> Say, isn't that instruction supposed to read 'flds    -8(%ebp);' ? (mark
> the '-')

No, 8(%ebp) is where the function's argument is (the first
instruction is a pushl, then %ebp is assigned from %esp).

-- 
DE