From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 12 20:56:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A04816A419 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:56:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741C213C481 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2007 15:56:38 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.5-GA) with ESMTP id JIB40845; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:56:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2007 15:55:32 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18232.48642.463639.901784@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:56:34 -0500 To: "Bahman M." In-Reply-To: <20071112230920.17bac37c@attila> References: <20071111195501.46d58539@p4> <200711120704.lAC744lR082341@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <20071112230920.17bac37c@attila> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Olivier Nicole , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: One Laptop Per Child X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:56:47 -0000 Bahman M. writes: > On 2007-11-12 Olivier Nicole wrote: > > That is a difficult issue, while this is an opportunity, I doubt this > > is the most needed thing to provide education. We are talking giving > > laptop to people who do not even have electricity in some cases... > > I second the idea. > > No doubt that OLPC is a great effort but I wonder how such ideas > will be useful in 3rd world countries where the IT > infrastructures are so poor that even dial-up Internet is not > available in some towns, let alone villages and rural regions. I > try to be not cynic but there are so many problems in education > system that learning how to use a computer has a low priority. The problem I have always had with this is computer use does not exist in a vacuum; it changes, and is changed by, the society in which it happens. If I look at the countries of the "first world", I see places that have walked the path from the written word to the telegraph to the telephone to the computer. At each step they've tested the new technology, learning what it can and cannot do, discovering stuff the inventors never even imagined, discarding ideas that are techically problematic or culturally unpalatable, and adapting to it as it adapted to them. Now consider dropping 100,000 OLPC on a country where the (median and mode) hardware layer is paper and ink, the government - often autocratic and kleptocratic - cannot manage to install and run a 1950's era phone system, and religious leaders fulminate against imunization as a "foreign plot". Even under the best of circumstaces exactly what do people reasoaly expect to happen? Robert Huff