From owner-freebsd-multimedia  Mon May 12 23:07:41 1997
Return-Path: <owner-multimedia>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA02721
          for multimedia-outgoing; Mon, 12 May 1997 23:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fyeung5 (netific.vip.best.com [205.149.182.145])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA02716
          for <multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 12 May 1997 23:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fyeung8.netific.com (fyeung8.netific.com [204.238.125.8]) by fyeung5 (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA23905; Mon, 12 May 1997 01:05:43 -0700
Received: by fyeung8.netific.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA28148; Mon, 12 May 1997 12:58:16 -0700
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 12:58:16 -0700
From: fyeung@fyeung8.netific.com (Francis Yeung)
Message-Id: <9705121958.AA28148@fyeung8.netific.com>
To: jakob@teligent.se, dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu
Subject: Re: Vic and Quickcam
Cc: multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Sender: owner-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Greetings

	Does anyone have the NV-qcam - CuSeeMe conferencing
working with the BSDI Reflector ? Accordingly, I am supposed
to use multicast for Reflector and the NV-qcam but I still don't
see any video. Maybe I did something fundamentally wrong.

	I have the nv-qcam and the reflector in a FreeBSD machine
and try to conference with a Win95 running CuSeeMe over the Net.
Accordingly, nv-qcam is not ready for point to point CuSeeMe type
of conferencing but with the reflector, I should be able to 
fake it. Maybe I am wrong.

	Thank you for your help.

	Francis

p.s. I can't use vic because it is not CuSeeME compatible.


	



> From root@fyeung25.netific.com Mon May 12 12:18 PDT 1997
> Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 09:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
> X-Sender: dwhite@localhost
> To: Jakob Alvermark <jakob@teligent.se>
> Cc: multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: Vic and Quickcam
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
> 
> On Mon, 12 May 1997, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
> 
> > Ok, I see.. Well.. I tried now with programs i found on your machine, 
> > vic-qcam and nv-qcam, and it works! The two machines I connect are on the 
> > same ethernet, same subnet, so I think mrouted shouldn't be needed in 
> > this case. One thing that might come up is running multicast applications 
> > between our two offices. The two offices are connected via a 128Kb/s 
> > link, and bridges. I assume the bridges work on "ethernet"-level, so it 
> > shold work. Well, I have to find out that myself. :-)
> 
> Cool.  Yes, if your machines are onthe same subnet then multicast will
> work without any further configuration.  You either need to reconfigure y
> our routers or use mrouted if you want to get to other places in your LAN
> that are behind routers.
> 
> Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
> Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
> http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major
> 
> 
>