From owner-freebsd-questions Sun May 14 8:55:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from po4.wam.umd.edu (po4.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC2137B842 for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 08:55:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from culverk@wam.umd.edu) Received: from rac2.wam.umd.edu (root@rac2.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.142]) by po4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05804; Sun, 14 May 2000 11:55:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rac2.wam.umd.edu (sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac2.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA19890; Sun, 14 May 2000 11:54:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost) by rac2.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19886; Sun, 14 May 2000 11:54:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: rac2.wam.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 11:54:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver To: Neil Blakey-Milner Cc: Dan Nelson , Omachonu Ogali , Brennan W Stehling , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.0 already? In-Reply-To: <20000514141442.A18036@mithrandr.moria.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG neither would I, I'm just referring to the "official" statement. ================================================================= | Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around. | | Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 | | and student at The | AIM: muythaibxr | | The University of Maryland, | Website: (Under Construction) | | College Park. | http://www.wam.umd.edu/~culverk/| ================================================================= On Sun, 14 May 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > On Sun 2000-05-14 (01:27), Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > again, I also think 4.0 is very stable, but read the archives around the > > time 4.0 was released. Jordan said that it isn't to be considered > > "officially" stable until 4.1 > > And changed his mind when he noticed what the code freeze had led > towards. There are copious indications on the mailing lists referring > to his retraction of any statements about inherent instability in > dot-zero releases. He also said that we'd never have a release like 3.0 > again (amen to that!). > > 4.0 is considered the better choice. I wouldn't advise anyone to use > 3.4 over it, certainly. > > Neil > -- > Neil Blakey-Milner > Advocate In Chief, Sunesi Clinical Systems > nbm@mithrandr.moria.org > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message