From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 9 08:48:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEEC916A4CE for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 08:48:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.67.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825AF43D41 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 08:48:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1Bu5pJ-000GIr-Fb; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:48:17 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 09:48:17 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Glenn Sieb Message-ID: <20040809084817.GW87690@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Glenn Sieb , freebsd-doc@freebsd.org References: <1091989450.570.2.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <20040808202351.GV87690@submonkey.net> <41168DF7.2090601@wingfoot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1R6ZDISWaA1muLP0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41168DF7.2090601@wingfoot.org> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questionable statement in article X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 08:48:19 -0000 --1R6ZDISWaA1muLP0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 04:32:55PM -0400, Glenn Sieb wrote: > Ceri Davies said the following on 8/8/2004 4:23 PM: >=20 > >On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:24:10PM +0200, Joel Dahl wrote: > >=20 > > > >>From > >>/usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/explaining-bsd/article.html: > >> > >>"BSD can execute Linux code, while Linux can not execute BSD code. As a > >>result, more software is available for BSD than for Linux." > >> > >>The last sentence can't be an established fact that's measurable in > >>numbers, or am I wrong? No big deal, but why not just cut it down to: > >> > >>"BSD can execute Linux code, while Linux can not execute BSD code." > >> =20 > >> > > > >I don't think anyone has actually counted, but it's essentially a > >tautology: > >For code(bsd) > 0, code(bsd) + code(linux) > code(linux). > > > But this only holds as long as code(bsd) > code(linux) to begin with....= =20 > no? I'm assuming you failed math. Ceri --=20 It is not tinfoil, it is my new skin. I am a robot. --1R6ZDISWaA1muLP0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBFzpRocfcwTS3JF8RAl59AJ9uW5JKUTBQ7uQdgrXeDwiSLoK3KQCffa+B 1n17zPXN56f86EUmJGxbgYg= =VAV6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1R6ZDISWaA1muLP0--