From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 7 22:32:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C287ED; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 22:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [199.48.134.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2175319E1; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 22:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (nucleus.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2001:470:8:1205:2:2:ff:29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 412F923F845; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:32:50 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 onyx.glenbarber.us 412F923F845 Authentication-Results: onyx.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:32:47 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: Rick Macklem Subject: Re: Should I do a __FreeBSD_version bump for a kgssapi module kernel api change? Message-ID: <20130707223247.GE28252@glenbarber.us> References: <1377697099.2894084.1373234070477.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1377697099.2894084.1373234070477.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 22:32:51 -0000 --VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 05:54:30PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have a commit to add support for host-based (Kerberos would call > these "service") principal initiator credentials to the kgssapi and > krpc. >=20 > It requires an additional call into the kgssapi, which means a change > to the kernel api used to communicate with the kgssapi module (not used > by anything else). >=20 > What I am not sure of is whether or not this change requires a bump to > __FreeBSD_version? (I think it would be possible to crash if the kernel > is updated, but the kgssapi module is not.) >=20 Yes please. It would also be helpful to document in the freebsd-versions section of doc/head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.xml . Glen --VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJR2eyPAAoJEFJPDDeguUajDdMH/RWE6X3i/hIyi/nTpYehIbto J0nWuun98qy8VvpL20HmH+nebbcngicNxgUct3/sIj/T0AI7QgkHdWPTOK/LNdCJ dsbbNKxmAaVm/2Q3BpLUYIJXS+lJK2BKHivgQbxEieXB+DJEEYa6fTSzbsitoSKN iwbs0Nvt3il9A2Uc1hxOzLYqJaKGh6qfbQc88f/8LJcVAFpaeG0ugt4ZooHTOHMS ocwnG1pqvaJ0tWKixxiEn2CUQ/tqvTsSqqyaN/tB8262XsJJZm15GsZWp5S9G6IX LTuSClxixtjwM7N2+ycd8TWFDanlsZS2hygbOFkinGwHga8O/b/AfEx9dVc4/0A= =MAoI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VUDLurXRWRKrGuMn--