From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 16 01:01:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A322416A401; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdlists@bsdunix.ch) Received: from conversation.bsdunix.ch (ns1.bsdunix.ch [82.220.17.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1E443D45; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:01:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdlists@bsdunix.ch) Received: from localhost (localhost.bsdunix.ch [127.0.0.1]) by conversation.bsdunix.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACB065DF; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 03:00:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from conversation.bsdunix.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (conversation.bsdunix.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18578-06-6; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 03:00:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (unknown [82.220.17.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by conversation.bsdunix.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C686234; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 03:00:55 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20060416002616.GC56603@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <20060415231724.BE7D545083@ptavv.es.net> <4A234C75-451D-42ED-8E06-EC0E89AE44CC@bsdunix.ch> <20060416002616.GC56603@heff.fud.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Thomas Vogt Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 03:00:53 +0200 To: Andrew Thompson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.bsdunix.ch Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tinderbox mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:01:27 -0000 Am 16.04.2006 um 02:26 schrieb Andrew Thompson: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 02:05:00AM +0200, Thomas Vogt wrote: >> Am 16.04.2006 um 01:17 schrieb Kevin Oberman: >>> The box was running 6.1-BETA from March 13 and Postfix 2.2.10 and >>> uses >>> TLS. The one unusual thing about the system is that it receives mail >>> from our organizational server via IPv6 only. >>> >>> Smells a bit like a timing issue in the rc code, but I really am >>> only >>> guessing. >> >> I can confirm this behavior also for 5.4 machines (postfix-2.2.5,1). >> On some of my server postfix does not start after a reboot on other >> it does start. All server are identical in software releases except >> hardware. > > Are you using the right startup method? > > /usr/ports/UPDATING: > > 20060112: > AFFECTS: users of mail/postfix, mail/postfix1, mail/postfix21, > mail/postfix-current > AUTHOR: mnag@FreeBSD.org > > Now all postfix ports use rcNG script to startup. If you have any > file > in etc/rc.d directory linked to sbin/postfix, please remove. > Do not forget to add 'postfix_enable="YES"' in your rc.conf I don't use the methode mentioned in /ports/UPDATING 2006. I use postfix 2.2.5 which was released in October 2005 and my system is a FreeBSD 5.4-Release-pX (security branch). So I guess the new startup methode doesn't affect my system because the rcNG script for postfix was implemented later..or am I wrong? I use: # we have postfix sendmail_enable="YES" sendmail_flags="-bd" sendmail_pidfile="/var/spool/postfix/pid/master.pid" sendmail_procname="/usr/local/libexec/postfix/master" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" Regards, Thomas Vogt