From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Jan 28 12:35:15 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA08533
          for chat-outgoing; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 12:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA08521
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 12:34:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA10911; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 12:32:06 -0800 (PST)
To: Ping Mai <ping@stepnet.com>
cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Walnut Creek config 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Jan 1997 11:30:37 PST."
             <199701281930.LAA01581@tibet.stepnet.com> 
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 12:32:05 -0800
Message-ID: <10908.854483525@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

It doesn't have a T3 connection, it has a 100MB connection
(100BTX) into a router which then fans out into multiple T3s.

					Jordan

> with all the debate over cisco routers vs serial cards,
> i am curious as to what the walnet creek server use for
> its t3 connections.
> 
> forget i asked if this is a trade secret or some sort.
> 
> ping