From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 26 14:53:14 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA07047 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:53:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from hil-img-1.compuserve.com (hil-img-1.compuserve.com [149.174.177.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA07037 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:53:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by hil-img-1.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515) id RAA17457; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 17:52:40 -0500 Date: 26 Mar 97 17:51:08 EST From: Berend de Boer <100120.3121@CompuServe.COM> To: "'FreeBSD stable'" Subject: Re: -current and -stable mailing lists Message-ID: <970326225108_100120.3121_EHU116-1@CompuServe.COM> Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk You wrote: >> Ok, Jordan. You asked the question (and stirred up a bunch of traffic >> on this list). Did you come to any conclusion? > >Yes. I came to the conclusion that there is still too much variance >in what people want (which I expected) and that I'm not changing a >single thing about our branch naming as a result. :-) Everyone (or almost everyone) agreed on one thing: the current naming scheme is confusing. Then some proposals were put forward and of course as many people there are, as many proposals, but they were not that different, they all had the same intent: make the naming scheme more intuitive. I think we should now list the proposals, number them, and have a vote. Groetjes, Berend.