Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 02:19:36 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future of CTM Message-ID: <201509010020.t810Ja3j063872@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:08:31 -0700." <55E4DE6F.8060808@wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm wrote: > I'm torn about how much to say in public, but there are a couple of problems. ... Thanks for the analysis Peter. Before we go deeper, might there by chance be a frustrated SOC student whose project fizzled out & who might grasp CTM as a replacement/ top up project ? Or students coming to end of summer project thinking "That was fun! What next to hack ?" http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/soc-status/2015-August/date.html Perhaps not very likely but might be worth checking, as your post nicely describes the remit. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Reply after previous text, like a play - Not before, which looses context. Indent previous text with "> " Insert new lines before 80 chars. Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not ms.doc, Not base64. Subsidise contraception V. Global warming, pollution, famine, migration.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201509010020.t810Ja3j063872>