From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 12 7:54:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B617F37B405; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 07:54:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from simoeon.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9CEsNt02917; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:54:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011012104623.07614ec0@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:48:09 -0400 To: Alfatrion , "Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey)" From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: IPFW or IPFILTER? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3BC700CE.8000201@cybertron.tmfweb.nl> References: <20011012154307.O52936-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> <003601c15328$db264480$24b4a8c0@pretorian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think the original question was, configuration issues aside, which is faster. ---Mike At 04:40 PM 10/12/01 +0200, Alfatrion wrote: >Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey) wrote: > >>I tried IPFILTER for awhile ...and it very easy to use...but ..in my opinion >>it isnt as configurable as IPFW. >>I find IPF more configurable as IPFW. I don't know how to do the folowing >>in IPFW: pass out quick on tun0 proto tcp from any to any keep state. > >Alex > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message