Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:10:08 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org>, Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r334796 - head/lang/gcc44
Message-ID:  <20131125111008.GL12196@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1311250113570.1711@tuna.site>
References:  <201311242311.rAONBAn2059702@svn.freebsd.org> <0A5CE73D095D35D1C1F04476@atuin.in.mat.cc> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1311250113570.1711@tuna.site>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--5mN69Y7OHXGepfYh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 01:17:52AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > | +PORTNAME=3D	gcc47
> > |  PORTVERSION=3D	4.4.7
> >=20
> > You meant gcc44, right ?
>=20
> Oops, right.  All the full fledged testing unfortunately did not
> catch this kind of silly mistake.  Thanks for raising it (and sorry
> for committing the fix so quickly that I failed to acknowledge that
> in the commit log).
>=20
> > BTW, why not use PKGNAMESUFFIX=3D 44 here (and in the other ports) so=
=20
> > that you don't have to add distname ?
>=20
> Bapt asked the same. :-)  Below is what I responded.
>=20
> FWIW the description of UNIQUENAME does not mention PKGNAMESUFFIX either:
>=20
>    # UNIQUENAME - A name for your port that is globally unique.  By defau=
lt,
>    #              this is set to ${LATEST_LINK} when LATEST_LINK is set,
>    #              and to ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} otherwise.
>=20
> Gerald

UNIQUENAME is not unique and will slowly die and be replaced by PKGBASE whi=
ch
take in account the PKGNAMESUFFIX.

except that for now UNIQUENAME is used for the ldconfig file meaning that if
gerald would have chosen something different than changing the PORTNAME all=
 gcc
would have conflict with each others which is something we don't want :)

regards,
Bapt

--5mN69Y7OHXGepfYh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlKTMBAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExtmgCgvB6bh0jK2CtBmP0oEM+0Aypc
QzAAoLZfnYIrXLdBebLv8d36bkcYCME6
=YgYU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5mN69Y7OHXGepfYh--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131125111008.GL12196>