From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 30 23:31: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BCD37BA12 for ; Tue, 30 May 2000 23:31:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca7-95.ix.netcom.com [209.109.235.95]) by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA23039; Wed, 31 May 2000 02:30:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id XAA53327; Tue, 30 May 2000 23:30:54 -0700 (PDT) To: Tim Vanderhoek Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports projects References: <200005071229.FAA29460@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <200005301106.EAA47917@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000530174311.B83316@orange> <20000531015018.A90783@orange> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 30 May 2000 23:30:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: Tim Vanderhoek's message of "Wed, 31 May 2000 01:50:18 -0400" Message-ID: Lines: 26 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Tim Vanderhoek * That's what it did when I tested it. :-) That's fine then. * Looking over it again, now, I don't think the -L symlink test adds * anything useful. No big deal either way.... * Since I was responsible for the original tclsh and wish, I can add * this to the various ports. Thanks! * Do you think it's better to use a single copy of it in a shared * ${PKGDIR} (ie. the way it's done for the INSTALL.tclsh and * INSTALL.wish scripts), or to put a copy into each tclsh and wish port? * The use of `portcheckout` is increasing, but I'm not sure it really * matters in that context. I think I favour a single copy synched with * INSTALL.(tcl|wi)sh. I don't mind either way. Just be consistent with INSTALL.{tcl,wi}sh. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message