Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:12:29 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: kib@FreeBSD.org, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cpuctl(formely devcpu) patch test request Message-ID: <10261.1212703949@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:09:27 %2B0400." <20080606020927.8d6675e1.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20080606020927.8d6675e1.stas@FreeBSD.org>, Stanislav Sedov writes: >The updated patch is available at >http://www.springdaemons.com/stas/cpuctl.2.diff Have we fully thought though the potential for halt&catch_fire ? Would it make sense to have a more granular security model than the simple device-node access based "are you root?" test ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10261.1212703949>