From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 25 06:37:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDEA16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 06:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web40301.mail.yahoo.com (web40301.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E43B43D5C for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 06:37:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from satimis@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040425133736.57720.qmail@web40301.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.88.168.147] by web40301.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:37:36 CST Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:37:36 +0800 (CST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Stephen=20Liu?= To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <20040425125749.GC62943@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Open Office - installation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 13:37:36 -0000 Hi Matthew, Tks for your advice. > > Can I use 'zxvf' to untar the packages and do > 'setup' > > to install OOo, the normal way not FreeBSD way? > > No -- in this case the files being referred to are > in fact FreeBSD > pkg's. You can certainly extract the contents using > 'tar -zxvf', but > it won't do you a great deal of good. This isn't > like the OO packages > for other OSes, where you unpack a tar-ball and run > an included shell > script to copy everything into the appropriate > locations. The FreeBSD > pkg_add(1) program handles all that uncompressing, > untarring and > copying things completely automatically, as well as > doing some > additional stuff like registering the package in > /var/db/pkgs Noted with thanks. I also want to install OOo 1.1.1 following FreeBSD way. I'm expecting a reply from Joshua or other folks to my posting whether I can stop running 'make clean' the ports trees in the mid-way. In doing so it won't damage the OS. After clarification I shall install 'automake' first. then install/upgrade to 'ORBit-0.5.17_2' and then install OOo 1.1.1 > > Is it necessary to remove OOo-1.1 first which I > > re-setup temperarily to work. > > You might be able to get away with having both > OpenOffice-1.1 and > OpenOffice-1.1.1 installed simultaneously, as they > both install to > separate subdirs of /usr/local. However, apart from > using up huge > amounts of disk space, I don't see that's going to > do a great deal for you. The reason for my question is 'I want to have OOo1.1.1 running smoothly first before erasing OOo 1.1.0" > OpenOffice-1.1.1 release is available via ports -- > but apparently not > yet as a precompiled package from > http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ > or the usual FreeBSD FTP sites. > > You can compile it yourself, but be warned: it's > huge, has quite a > long dependency list and takes geological ages to > compile. Not for > the faint hearted or those without a powerful > machine. It is really my problem. I am running FreeBSD on a slow machine. I try to avoid installing packages from source code B.R. Stephen _______________________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com.hk address at http://mail.english.yahoo.com.hk