From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jun  5 22:38:35 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA29236
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 22:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA29228
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 22:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA18905; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 22:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Any objection to the following? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Jun 1997 14:58:39 +0930."
             <199706060528.OAA01330@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> 
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 22:38:35 -0700
Message-ID: <18901.865575515@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Hmm.  Any reason it can't just be a list in rc.conf?  The basic idea 
> is OK, althought you might want to consider /usr/local/etc/ld.so.conf
> as well for use/manipulation by ports...

Well, if I went that route then it also wouldn't really be correct
unless done in fashion of the local_startup list, and I'm not sure I'm
willing to go quite that far yet. :-)

					Jordan