From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Sep 12 18:48:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from grumpy.dyndns.org (user-24-214-57-209.knology.net [24.214.57.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA94937B40F; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumpy.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8D1mKG89031; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 20:48:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dkelly@grumpy.dyndns.org) Message-Id: <200109130148.f8D1mKG89031@grumpy.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Andreas Klemm Cc: Bzdik BSD , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: David Kelly Subject: Re: surprise: he finds FreeBSD is a better OS In-reply-to: Message from Andreas Klemm of "Wed, 12 Sep 2001 20:46:54 +0200." <20010912204654.A19750@titan.klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 20:48:20 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Andreas Klemm writes: > > You forget to mention his conclusion, which doesn't look so shiny: I found his conclusion said more than he thought he was saying. For all of his lip service to a fair discussion and evaluation in the rest of the article he gets right down to brass tacks and shows the Linux bias. He selects "goodies" over reliability. Recognizes FreeBSD's performance is better but elects Linux for a journaling filesystem. He just wants something to play with, the more "play" the better. FreeBSD was too good. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message