From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 14 17:48:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157FA16A401; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:48:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk (pasmtp.tele.dk [193.162.159.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD5643D69; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:48:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (0x535c0e2a.sgnxx1.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [83.92.14.42]) by pasmtp.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C181EC322; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:48:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2EHmP0H022177; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:48:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Christian Kratzer From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:45:54 +0100." <20060314184157.V10576@vesihiisi.cksoft.de> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:48:25 +0100 Message-ID: <22176.1142358505@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann , Florent Thoumie Subject: Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:48:38 -0000 In message <20060314184157.V10576@vesihiisi.cksoft.de>, Christian Kratzer writes: >> IMHO, Open{BGP,OSPF}D belong in src/contrib, not in ports/net. > >please don't bloat the base system with something that can run >equally well from ports. I would tend to agree. 90% or more of all FreeBSD systems will not run either of these routing daemons, so their rightful place is in ports. Also, considering the general hazzleness of src/contrib I think ports offer a far more flexible infrastructure for dealing with the software (such as openospfd-stable vs openospfd-cvs versions etc.) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.