From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Oct 22 13:08:24 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA23368
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 13:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions)
Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA23363
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 13:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from root@implode.root.com)
Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA22789;
	Wed, 22 Oct 1997 13:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199710222010.NAA22789@implode.root.com>
To: Steve Hovey <shovey@buffnet.net>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Whats this mean? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Oct 1997 16:04:10 EDT."
             <Pine.BSI.3.95.971022160338.11317J-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 13:10:24 -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>On Wed, 22 Oct 1997, David Greenman wrote:
>
>> >
>> >> fxp0: warning: unsupported PHY, type = 7, addr = 1
>> >
>> >
>> >I get this on my 2.2.2R
>> 
>>    It means that you have a newer Pro/100B card that has an 82555 PHY chip
>> on it. I didn't add support for that until after FreeBSD 2.2.2.
>> 
>
>Its seems to be working that way though..  Should I be worried enough to
>upgrade from 2.2.2?

   It may not work in both (10/100) modes and you won't be able to use it
in full duplex. You should upgrade to 2.2.5 in any case - we've fixed a
lot of important bugs.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project